Showing posts with label LMDC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LMDC. Show all posts

Monday, August 29, 2011

City Council Finance Committee tries for another Hearing on the Chinatown B.I.D. SEPT. 7th '11


Councilmember Margaret Chin has sent out a notice to an undetermined number of property owners in Chinatown announcing another hearing by the Finance Committee of the City Council chaired by Councilmember Dominic Recchia, about the Chinatown Business Improvement District, on September 7th at 12:pm at Emigrant Savings Bank49-51 Chambers Street.
Councilmember Margaret Chin

This time Councilmember Chin, who is of Chinese descent and has a history in Chinatown in one form or another over the last forty years, decided to translate the notice into Chinese (on the back of the notice) and sent a notice directly from her office.

A previous one sheet notice was sent to some property owners and residential tenants in Chinatown by the Chinatown Partnership LDC (not by Chin's office) about the May 26th Finance Committee hearing on the BID. That notice was sent on May 13th, but had no Chinese translation, a point that was raised by Councilmember Reyna at the hearing. Although Wellington Chen claims" it cannot be bi-lingual because the law says it can only be one piece, double-sided, in English" and therefore didn't allow for additional pages for Chinese translation, we could not find anywhere in the BID law that notices of finance committee hearings mailed to property owners must be this way. We must find, therefore, that this omission was a deliberate attempt to ensure the least possible number of property owners attending the hearing of May 26th.

A Chinatown property owner reported that she spoke to Tanisha Edwards, Counsel for the City Council, regarding this hearing on September 7th and this is what she said: "Spoke briefly to Tanisha Edwards, counsel for Finance Committee of the City Council. She said that they will expect everyone who wanted to speak will have a chance to do so at this meeting. There will be 200 seats at the Emigrant Savings Bank auditorium. When I asked how early will we have to show up to get in to speak she said the speakers will start at 12:01pm sharp and there would be no problem. When I referred to that other meeting, she insisted it would not be a problem. "This is an oversight meeting so we want to hear from everyone." I plan to bother her one more time asking if we had to register ahead of time. "

The last hearing on the Chinatown BID by the Finance Committee was a total fiasco which included Chinatown property owners being shut out of the hearing at 250 Broadway. After building security told property owners who were waiting to be checked into the building that the hearing was "closed for the day," a spokesman for the City Council told the property owners that a special list existed for speakers to register in advance, and that speakers would have to be cleared with the Council attorneys. The Sargent at Arms for the City Council berated property owners for "messing up". This has yet to be determined, whether a special list of speakers indeed exists. Normally anyone wishing to testify at an open hearing does not have to pre-register or check in with the Councilmembers with an attendance list. A favorite tactic of the Chinatown Partnership, the entity pushing to form the BID, is to pack the room with paid CPLDC employees and non-testifying "supporters" from community boards and other BIDs so that there is no room for property owners. Likely this tactic will be futile this time around.

Perhaps realizing the implications of shutting out legitimate discourse and dialogue opposing the Chinatown BID, the City Council Finance Committee and Councilmember Margaret Chin have scheduled this additional "exploratory" hearing on the BID.

What: City Council Finance Committee Exploratory hearing on the Chinatown B.I.D.
Where: Emigrant Savings Bank 49-51 Chambers Street Manhattan
Time: 12:pm noon
When: September 7th
ATTENDEES MUST ARRIVE NO LATER THAN 11:AM, speakers must sign up immediately to fill out speaker cards.

Questions: Property Tax Payers Corp. / No Chinatown BID: 917-710-7503 Jan Lee
Margaret Chin's office: 212 788-7259

IF YOU CANNOT ATTEND, you may FAX your statement about the Chinatown BID to Tanisha Edwards at:
212-788-7061



















Monday, November 29, 2010

Click here to hear Phil Grossman -Coalition Against the Chinatown B.I.D. re: complaint filed with LMDC against Chinatown Partnership LDC




On November 10th 2010 Phillip Grossman, an attorney representing the Coalition Against the Chinatown B.I.D. sent a letter to the Lower Manhattan Development Committee alerting them to what amounts to be a "Grossly wasteful expenditure of your $5,400,000.00 Clean Streets program-grant", by the Chinatown Partnership Local Development Corp. The Coalition's complaint is based on an analysis of the "Partnership's" 990 forms which are required for non-profits to file with the IRS. CPLDC's 990 form 2006 2007 2008 that The Coalition Against the Chinatown BID obtained through a "Freedom of information Law (FOIL)" request, since the Chinatown Partnership does NOT post their 990's on their own website, is a serious point of contention for years by business and property owners in Chinatown.


The letter reads as follows:
PHILIP J. GROSSMAN
ATTORNEY AT LAW
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10013

November 10, 2010

Lower Manhattan Development, Corp.
One Liberty Plaza
New York, NY 10006

ATTN: David EMIL, President

Re: Grossly wasteful expenditure of your $5,400,000.00 Clean Streets program grant to CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Dear Mr. David Emil:

I represent various local property owners and the groups known as the coalition of Business And property owners, and The Coalition Against The CHINATOWN B.I.D., in connection with this complaint to your agency. The local property owners whom I represent, and whom are affiliated with the above-mentioned groups, have been adversely affected by the gross waste of the $5,400,000.00 clean streets program grant to the CHINATOWN PARTNERSHTP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.

In support of our complaint of grossly wasteful expenditures, I enclose our "ANALYSIS OF CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CLEAN STREETS EXPENDITURES under AGREEMENT #: M07-571* For PERIOD FROM January 01, 2006 to June 30,2009, with supporting schedule and documentation. Our analysis is limited to the period from January 01, 2005 to June 30, 2009, because financial statements for the period
after June 30 , 2009, are not yet available from the CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.

The basis of our complaint, is that based on the above described analysis of financials for the period from January 01, 2006 to June 30, 2OO9 in which the CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. expended $2,025,352.00 of your agency's clean streets program grant, it appears that only $633,608.00 was actually expended on street cleaning and maintenance, which is only 31.3.percent of the total funds expended for the period.

Furthermore, under: the 8/I/2008 addendum to the contract between the CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. and the street cleaning sub-contractor BLOCK BY BLOCK (copy attached, ) the parties to the contract agreed that the sub-contractor BLOCK BY BLOCK, would be reimbursed for it's street cleaning management personnel, and which reimbursement in fact did occur. See copies attached of BLOCK BY BLOCK invoices.


Page 2 of 2

Therefore, in view of the fact that the street cleaning sub-contractor Block By Block was managing Chinatown street cleaning crew, it is astounding and amazing that, the "CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. expended $583,266.00* on management personnel, out of total expenditures of $2,025,352, for the period from January 01,2006 to, June 30, 2oo9, or 28 percent of the total fund expended for the period.

Furthermore local property owners, and. store owners, have been damaged by the gross waste of your agency's street cleaning grant by the CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP., in fact they have not derived the full benefit of your agency’s street cleaning grant, as only 31.3 percent of the grant was actually expended on street cleaning and maintenance.

Therefore, we respectfully request that your agency investigate, what appears to be, a gross waste of the clean streets grant money by the CHINATOWN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP., and we also respectfully request that you seek recoupment, of what appears to be,
grossly wasted grant money.

Philip J. Grossman

Lower Manhattan Development Corp., One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor,
York, NY 10006, ATTN: Avi Schick, chairman Board of Directors

*The Chinatown Partnership Local Development Corp. at one time had a staff of four, and currently has a staff of only two. The Executive Director's salary for several years has been over $100,000.00 annually. The cleaners hired by Block by Block number only ten people.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Councilman Gerson Delivers over a hundred petitions to LMDC office



At 1:00pm today, NYC Council Member Alan Gerson, NYC Comptroller William C. Thompson, Jr., public advocate candidate Norman Siegel and residents, community leaders and business owners from Chinatown, rallied at the offices of the Lower Manhattan Development (LMDC) Corporation to demand that LMDC funds allocated for the NYC Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Redesign of Chatham Square be withheld, based on widespread community disapproval of the plan.





Council member Gerson delivered a petition to the LMDC, signed by the boards of directors of several local residential buildings including Chatham Towers, Chatham Green and Southbridge Towers, representing over 5500 residents. Over 140 local businesses also signed the petition demanding the embargo of the funds. The Chatham Square Redesign has been formally rejected by Community Boards 1 & 3, and is “untested, unpopular and unsafe,” according to community leaders, who have created an alternative plan, which was vetted by a professional traffic engineer, Brian Ketcham.



The planning process for Chatham Square was initiated by the LMDC in 2003 to address issues of traffic congestion, pedestrian safety, increasing public space as well as re-establishing the connections that were cut off when Park Row was closed. Subsequently, a sub-recipient agreement allocated $30,690,000 in LMDC funds to the project, none of which has been invoiced yet.



Gerson, Chair of the Council’s Committee on Lower Manhattan Redevelopment, said “The NYC Department of Transportation must listen to the concerns of the community before it proceeds with major traffic reconfigurations. The Chatham Square area community is united in its opposition to this misguided plan, and we will do everything in our power to stop it from moving forward. The Lower Manhattan Development
Corporation has an excellent track record of stewarding federal funds.

It was demonstrated clearly at a City Council joint hearing that the NYC Department of Transportation is in violation of several community input requirements of the sub-recipient agreement. Therefore, the LMDC has a fiduciary responsibility to demand that the community review process fulfill the contractual agreement before funds are disbursed.”



NYC Council Transportation Committee Chairperson John Liu said, "We convened a joint oversight hearing on February 5 to examine the City's proposed Chatham Square Reconfiguration. Despite substantial objections from area residents and businesses to the plan, including formal resolutions from Manhattan Community Boards 1 and 3 rejecting the plan, the City had indicated the project will move forward. Chairperson Gerson and I had called for a full community review of the DOT's plans, including a six-month breathing-period delay in the plans to commence construction, because little information and opportunity for feedback has been afforded to the community. The City cannot disregard the community objections and outcry formally submitted today by way of petitions."



“I fully support this petition, and hope that the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation will heed the call by the community and elected officials to reconsider its funding of the Chatham Square / Park Row Improvement Program,” said New York City Comptroller William C. Thompson, Jr. “This ill-conceived plan, developed by the City, has completely failed to take community concerns into consideration. Furthermore, if it moves forward, small businesses in Chinatown will loose significant amount of business at a time when they can least afford it. If the City will not step in and address these concerns, then I urge LMDC to take immediate action and stop this program from moving forward.”



Community leader Jeannie Chin said, “The LMDC must follow their own charter mandate in considering the tremendous effect that the reconfiguration of Chatham Square would have on the lives of thousands of residents and businesses surrounding Chatham Square and on the thousands more who use this critical major cross-town intersection in Chinatown and Lower Manhattan. With three other nearby cross-town streets shuttered either for reconstruction or permanently -- Fulton Street until 2014 and Park Row/Pearl Streets -- one cannot begin to imagine the traffic congestion, air quality and emergency access issues that our community will face in the next 4-5 years. We challenge the DOT to examine the community alternative and the LMDC to look before funding this white elephant.”



Several other community leaders including Danny Chen, Jan Lee and Margaret Chin also spoke passionately against the proposed traffic plan. Gerson then carried the petitions to the LMDC.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Petition Drive in Chinatown - LMDC funding for Chatham Square must stop now






CCRC has started its petition drive today, Sunday April 19th. The LMDC must understand that the DOT and Mayor's plan for the reconstruction of Chatham Square has no support in Chinatown.
Business leaders, community leaders and organizations will be canvassing the Chinatown area to gather signatures on the petitions shown here.
These petitions may be printed, signed and mailed back to the addresses shown at the top, or dropped off at Lin Sing association at # 49 Mott St. 2nd floor - Attention Eddie Chiu.

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Guidelines for funds disbursements from LMDC - Compensation for construction projects below Canal St.

Funding for the Program is being made available from an appropriation to New York State by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
I. General Grant Information
A. Eligible Firms

Assistance will be provided to any “Eligible Firm” that is still in business at the “Eligible Premises” at the time of application and grant payment, and complies with the terms of these Guidelines, and meets the following criteria (see Definitions of terms in Section II below):
(i) is a for-profit Retail Business; and is
(ii) located in the Eligible Area; and is
(iii) located on an Eligible Block; and is
(iv) an Eligible Premises; and
(v) submits an application that shows a Demonstrated Impact on net income, revenues, or operating expenses, net of any proceeds from business interruption insurance or other Federal assistance, during the period of the street or sidewalk closure; and
(vi) submits a Grant Request Form (included with the application); and is
(vii) current on all taxes and other municipal charges.
B. Grant Amounts
Subject to the requirements set forth in these Guidelines, Eligible Firms may be awarded grants computed as follows:
(i) $2.50 per square foot of owned, leased or rented space at Eligible Premises; OR
(ii) the amount of realized economic loss as shown in the applicant’s Demonstrated Impact statement, whichever is less.
Program grants will be capped at $25,000 in the aggregate for each Eligible Firm.
Small Firm Assistance Program Guidelines as of 02/2008 Page 2
II. Definitions
A. Eligibility Period
The Eligibility Period for the Program will begin on July 1, 2007 and includes construction projects underway on this date and projects commencing thereafter until all funds are disbursed or until the Program concludes on December 31, 2010. It is highly recommended that you apply as soon as you are eligible because funds are limited.
B. Retail Business
A Retail Business is defined as a business that sells or provides a good or service. To be eligible, neither the owner of the business nor the business itself may employ more than 50 people. For the avoidance of doubt, an applicant will not be eligible if it employs more than 50 people at its location on the Eligible Block. Similarly, an applicant will not be eligible if it employs less than 50 people at its location on the Eligible Block, but the applicant has more than 50 employees in the aggregate.
C. Eligible Area
The Eligible Area is that area within the Borough of Manhattan bounded on the north by Canal Street (including both sides of Canal Street), from the Hudson River to Rutgers Street (including both sides of Rutgers Street), then southeast along Rutgers Street and continuing along Rutgers Slip (including both sides of Rutgers Slip), to the East River.
D. Eligible Block
An Eligible Block is a block on which the street or sidewalk has been closed or partially closed for at least fifteen days within any thirty consecutive day period due to a publicly-funded construction project as determined by LMDC. The street or sidewalk closure must occur during the Eligibility Period. Publicly-funded construction projects include all projects supported by Federal, State and/or City funds. Each month LMDC will post a list of Eligible Blocks on its website: www.renewnyc.com.
E. Eligible Premises
Eligible Premises shall mean business premises (non-residential) located at street level or below-grade with street level access within the Eligible Area on an Eligible Block at which the Eligible Firm operates its business. The Eligible Premises must have been open for business for at least the entire calendar month prior to the temporary street or sidewalk closure along the Eligible Block and still be in business at that location when the grant is paid.
F. Demonstrated Impact
To be eligible for a grant under this program a firm must demonstrate an impact on its business due to the street or sidewalk closure. Impact may be demonstrated through the submission of financial statements, including monthly operating statements, profit and loss statements or cash flow statements. Such statements must show the sales or revenue for the period of the street or sidewalk closure as compared to the same period of the year prior. For new businesses, the sales or
Small Firm Assistance Program Guidelines as of 02/2008 Page 3
revenue for the period of the street or sidewalk closure should be compared to the prior month’s statements. All financial statements submitted with the application must be certified by an officer of the firm.
III. Application Information
A. Application Timing
Applications will be accepted on a rolling basis but funds are limited. Therefore, applications should be submitted within three months of when the firm is eligible.
For applications covering street or sidewalk closures that occurred between July 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007, one application may be submitted for the entire six month period. If you will be submitting an application for a grant covering street closures that occurred between July 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007 it is highly recommended that you apply immediately. Eligible Firms must file a completed application for Program assistance. As noted on the application, each completed application must include:
(i) a completely filled out and signed application form; and
(ii) a completely filled out and signed Small Firm Assistance Program Grant Request Form; and
(iii) a completely filled out and signed City of New York Substitute Form W-9; and
(iv) a copy of the written lease, deed or permit for the Eligible Premises at which the applicant is engaged in business, including any amendments; and
(v) an original utility bill for the Eligible Premises covering the period of the street or sidewalk closure for which the applicant is applying for assistance; and
(vi) verification by the Eligible Firm of the number of its employees (current payroll summary or NYS-45-MN); and
(vii) additional categorical information regarding the salary levels of the applicant’s employees; and
(viii) monthly operating, profit and loss, or cash flow statements verifying the applicant’s estimate of Demonstrated Impact.
LMDC, SBS or EDC may require additional or alternative documentation, in their sole discretion.
B. Separate Applications for Multiple Locations
Applicants are required to file separate applications for each Eligible Premises.
C. Application Submission
Applications for Program assistance will be accepted through the earlier of April 30, 2011 or the distribution of available funds. Applications will be processed in order of receipt of completed applications. Applications must be mailed to:
Small Firm Assistance Program Guidelines as of 02/2008 Page 4
Small Firm Assistance Program
c/o Lower Manhattan Development Corporation
One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor
New York, NY 10006
IV. Grant Payments
A. Grant Disbursements
Grants will be disbursed on a rolling basis, subject to the availability of Program funds, as well as continued eligibility by the Eligible Firm under the Program and compliance with all terms, conditions and requirements set forth in these Guidelines.
B. Grant Recapture
Grant recipients may be required to repay any or all money received under this Program if any of the following circumstances occur:
(i) if grant recipient’s application, including any information provided therewith or thereafter, contains any material misrepresentation; or
(ii) if the grant was made in error; or
(iii) if the grant recipient is not entitled to assistance under these Guidelines.
V. Processes
A. Determination Process
Applications will be reviewed for completeness and eligibility on a rolling basis in the order that they are received. Applicants who submit an incomplete application will be notified in writing that their application is incomplete and what needs to be submitted in order to complete their application. Applicants will then have twenty business days from the date the notice is postmarked to submit whatever is necessary to complete the application. Complete applications will be further reviewed for eligibility. LMDC, SBS and EDC will use reasonable efforts to evaluate and process all applications in a timely fashion. Background reviews will be performed on all firms before they are approved for a grant. In the event an application is denied, written notification will be provided with the reason for denial. Eligible firms will be notified in writing once they are approved for the grant.
B. Appeal Process
LMDC will notify applicants in writing if their application has been denied. If the applicant believes that its application was incorrectly denied (in whole or in part), the applicant may appeal such decisions within twenty business days from the date the denial notification is postmarked. Such appeal must be made in writing to LMDC and include such information as the applicant would like to be considered. An Appeal Committee will consider and decide all appeals. All decisions by the Appeal Committee shall be final. The Appeal Committee will be the sole arbiter in interpreting the intent and implementation of the Program and these Guidelines.
Small Firm Assistance Program Guidelines as of 02/2008 Page 5
VI. Legal Requirements
A. Audit and Control
LMDC and HUD may audit applications on a random or specified basis covering a period extending to three years after the Program concludes. LMDC and HUD reserve the right to contact at any time federal, state and local government agencies to confirm information included in any application.
B. Non-Discrimination
To be eligible for assistance under the Program, applicants must agree not to discriminate against any qualified person based on race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age or handicap.
C. Fraud Detection Prevention
Background reviews will be performed on all Eligible Firms; additionally, site visits and/or audits may be performed on either an announced or unannounced basis by LMDC and HUD or their auditors.
VII. Additional Information
A. Disclosure of Information
Except as required under law, LMDC, SBS and EDC will endeavor to maintain the confidentiality of tax, financial and rent information submitted as part of the application. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such information may be made available to LMDC, SBS and EDC staff and designated individuals that are processing the application and to Federal, State or local officials or auditors evaluating the Program.
B. Amendments to Guidelines
These Guidelines may be amended as needed. Any amendments to these Guidelines will only be available through the LMDC website: www.renewnyc.com.
C. Information on LMDC Website
The application form, these Guidelines and additional information about the Program can be accessed at LMDC’s website: www.renewnyc.com.